This is a balanced transportation problem because total supply = 140 + 260 + 360 = 760,
and total demand = 200 + 320 + 250 + 210 = 980. Wait—let’s check carefully:
• Supply = 140 + 260 + 360 = 760
• Demand = 200 + 320 + 250 + 210 = 980
So, demand is greater than supply. To balance, we add a dummy source with supply = 220
(980 − 760). Costs from dummy source to all destinations are taken as 0.
Step 1: Initial Feasible Solution (Using Vogel’s Approximation Method – VAM)
VAM is a good method to start because it gives a near-optimal solution.
Step 1a: Calculate penalties
For each row and column, find the difference between the two lowest costs.
• Row F₁: costs = 48, 60, 56, 58 → lowest two = 48, 56 → penalty = 8
• Row F₂: costs = 45, 55, 53, 60 → lowest two = 45, 53 → penalty = 8
• Row F₃: costs = 50, 65, 60, 62 → lowest two = 50, 60 → penalty = 10
• Dummy row: costs = 0, 0, 0, 0 → penalty = 0
Columns:
• W₁: 48, 45, 50, 0 → lowest two = 0, 45 → penalty = 45
• W₂: 60, 55, 65, 0 → lowest two = 0, 55 → penalty = 55
• W₃: 56, 53, 60, 0 → lowest two = 0, 53 → penalty = 53
• W₄: 58, 60, 62, 0 → lowest two = 0, 58 → penalty = 58
Step 1b: Choose highest penalty
Highest penalty = 58 (column W₄). Allocate to lowest cost in W₄ column. Costs: 58 (F₁), 60
(F₂), 62 (F₃), 0 (Dummy). Lowest = 0 (Dummy). Allocate demand 210 to Dummy → W₄
satisfied.
Remaining demand: W₄ = 0.
Step 1c: Recalculate penalties
Now ignore W₄. Highest penalty = 55 (column W₂). Lowest cost in W₂ column = 55 (F₂).
Allocate min(supply 260, demand 320) = 260.
So F₂ → W₂ = 260. Supply F₂ exhausted. Demand W₂ left = 60.
Step 1d: Next penalties